3.26.2009

The only time measuring in pounds is better than kilos...

I dared to step on the scale today and discovered I am down 10 pounds. Yey!

Trust me, I have more than a few to go to reach my completely realistic (wink, wink) goal of getting in hoochie mama condition by this summer. Nevertheless, this milestone gives me motivation and makes me smile.

The other thing that gives me hope and makes me grin?

This article, which seems to indicate that the 40s are the new 20s. Would you agree?

And, finally, here's another question for the day: If you had a body like Cindy Crawford's (pictured in the article) would you consider posing nude--not necessarily for Playboy (or any other magazine), but rather for your self? I'm just asking.

7 comments:

kenju said...

If I had a body like that, I might pose nude for a very artsy photo, one that is chaste and very tasteful, not prurient. But that will have to be in my next life, as I've already gone way beyond that in this one.

Sue Jacquette said...

I love this post. Yes, I am totally in agreement that 40 is the new 20 and I would ABSOLUTELY pose like that. If you've got it, flaunt it. For sure!

Danie said...

Germany, Spain and Italy...you can be as hoochy as you like :)

Good for you on the weight loss! It's so hard!

Diane Mandy said...

Sue and Kenju-- I'm with you. I think I'd pose if I looked like that.

Simple Answer said...

Congrats! 10 lbs is hard to lose!

I'd like Demi's ass. I would be naked all the time if that is what it looked like.

Lady Jane said...

Congrats on the 10 pounds - not an easy feat. I say that because I trying to lost that amount. As for your question - I would pose if I had her body but right now - not to crazy about my own:)) BTW - first time here- very entertained:) Good luck house hunting

C N Heidelberg said...

I know lots of real-life great-looking 40-somethings. But I don't think we should forget that ladies on magazine covers have been photoshopped and are not a good thing to compare oneself to.